simple? no it's complex

"Nature" is what we see— This poem is leading us to the higher level question and concern at the beginning. However, this poem finally leads us to the simplicity of nature which was not I was thinking when I was reading at the first time. All the poems are written to pass a meaningful massage, and author always use simple things and scenes to give or represent a bigger picture of life or human. However, this poem gives it’s purpose and idea of the connection between human and nature at the end of the poem which is ambiguity. Even though it lead us into another direction, but we can still analysis the first part on our own perspective.

When I first time read Emily Dickinson write all the things such as the hill, bumble bee, thunder and cricket, I felt that she is trying to tell us to pay attention to the nature and enjoy it as “Heaven” and “Harmony”, but at the end she wrote “So impotent Our Wisdom is To her Simplicity.” (Dickinson). this is the main point she is trying to tell us. It’s about the simplicity of great nature which she thinks is simple, but I feel that even if a most simple thing that exist in the nature it is absolutely beyond our wisdoms and art we have created. This massage which is ambiguity lead people to think that nature is simple, but on my perspective it is too hard to be studied, and that’s why people call it simple which our art cannot say.

I know there are so many poems which do not give the main passage or only direction, so readers will have to discover and analysis in their own way. However, this "Nature" is what we see— poem is very different from those kind of poem. In this poem, the author gives us the idea of the simplicity which provide all the Heaven and Harmony which we call art. Through this point so many people discover the simplicity, but I see the other side which is complexness. Thus, even though there is ambiguity to lead readers to different directions, but there is always some reader who sees things differently.